[00:00:04]
>> COMMISSIONER RODRIGUEZ CEJA.
[1. CALL TO ORDER AND ROLL CALL]
>> COMMISSIONER ESPERANZA VALDEZ.
CAN WE GET LEILA, CAN WE GET AN INTRODUCTION OF STAFF, PLEASE.
GOOD EVENING, VICE CHAIRPERSON AND MEMBERS OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION.
TONIGHT STAFF PRESENT AT THIS MEETING IS EVELYN BELTRAN, SECRETARY, MR. SNYDER THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT DIRECTOR, REBECCA WINSCOTT, OUR INTERIM FIRE MARSHAL, ROSIE LUA, ASSOCIATE PLANNER, JASON ANDERSON, CODE ENFORCEMENT MANAGER ZACH HEINSELMAN, OUR ASSISTANT CITY ATTORNEY, ROLDAN LOPEZ, ASSOCIATE ENGINEER, AND MYSELF LEILA NAMVAR, SENIOR PLANNER.
AND THEN NEXT OUR PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE.
COMMISSIONER CEJA I THINK IS GOING TO HELP US WITH THE FLAG IF YOU WOULDN'T MIND LEADING US IN THE PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE.
>> I PLEDGE ALLEGIANCE TO THE FLAG OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA AND TO THE REPUBLIC FOR WHICH IT STANDS, ONE NATION UNDER GOD, INDIVISIBLE WITH LIBERTY AND JUSTICE FOR ALL.
>> THANK YOU VERY MUCH, COMMISSIONER CEJA.
EVELYN, CAN WE GET A STATEMENT FROM THE COMMISSION SECRETARY,
[4. STATEMENT FROM THE COMMISSION SECRETARY]
PLEASE.THE GENERAL RULES OF COURTESY FOR VIRTUAL MEETINGS ARE AS FOLLOWS: PLEASE BE MINDFUL OF BACKGROUND NOISE WHEN JOINING THE VIRTUAL MEETING.
PARTICIPANTS MUST MUTE ALL LIVESTREAM DEVICES EVEN WHEN THEY ARE NOT SPEAKING.
WHEN YOUR MICROPHONE IS NOT MUTED, AVOID ACTIVITY THAT COULD CREATE ADDITIONAL NOISE.
POSITION YOUR CAMERA PROPERLY.
IF YOU CHOOSE TO USE A WEB CAMERA BE SURE IT IS IN A STABLE POSITION AND FOCUSED AT EYE LEVEL IF POSSIBLE IF YOU WILL BE SHARING CONTENT DURING THE MEETING, MAKE SURE YOU HAVE THE FILE AND/OR LINKS READY TO GO BEFORE THE MEETING BEGINS.
MEMBERS FROM THE PUBLIC WISHING TO PROVIDE ORAL TESTIMONY MUST FOLLOW THE INSTRUCTIONS ON THE AGENDA AND/OR ONLINE IN ORDER PROVIDE PUBLIC COMMENT FOR AGENDA OR NON-AGENDA ITEMS. MEMBERS FROM THE PUBLIC WISHING TO PROVIDE ORAL TESTIMONY HAVE THREE MINUTES TO PROVIDE ORAL TESTIMONY.
AND THEN NEXT WE HAVE A STATEMENT FROM CITY ATTORNEY ZACH HEINSELMAN, PLEASE.
[5. STATEMENT FROM THE CITY ATTORNEY]
THERE HAVE BEEN NO DIRECTIVES ISSUED TEMPORARILY HALTING LOCAL GOVERNMENT PROCESSING LAND USE AND DEVELOPMENT OF APPLICATIONS AND/OR CONSIDERATION OF POLICY ACTIONS INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENTS, ZONING CODE AMENDMENTS AND NEW OR AMENDED SPECIFIC PLANS THEREFORE THE CITY OF INDIO CONTINUES TO PROCESS APPLICATIONS IN ACCORDANCE WITH STATE AND LOCAL REQUIREMENTS.
THE CITY OF INDIO IS FOLLOWING GOVERNOR NEWSOM'S EXECUTIVE ORDINANCE N-25-20 AND N-29-20.
PERTAINING TO THE BROWN ACT THESE EXECUTIVE ORDERS ALLOW GOVERNMENTAL ENTITIES TO CONDUCT MEETINGS BY ELECTRONIC MEANS AND FOR MEMBERS OF THE PUBLIC TO OBSERVE THE MEETING ELECTRONICALLY AS WELL AS PROVIDE PUBLIC COMMENT OR PUBLIC TESTIMONY TELEPHONICALLY OR OTHERWISE ELECTRONICALLY.
ACCORDINGLY, THE CITY COUNCIL AND PLANNING COMMISSION ARE CURRENTLY CONDUCTING SCHEDULED MEETINGS IN A VIRTUAL MEETING FORMAT.
THE CITY OF INDIO HAS IMPLEMENTED TECHNOLOGY SOLUTIONS THAT ALLOW MEMBERS OF THE PUBLIC TO OBSERVE AND OFFER PUBLIC COMMENT AS WELL AS PUBLIC TESTIMONY DURING PUBLIC HEARING AT SCHEDULE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETINGS.
THE CITY IS COMMITTED TO PROVIDING PUBLIC PARTICIPATION OPPORTUNITIES WHILE ALSO COMPLYING WITH THE REQUIREMENTS FOR PROCESSING OF LAND USE AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW APPLICATIONS AND/OR CONSIDERATION OF POLICY ACTIONS.
EVELYN, DO WE HAVE ANY PUBLIC COMMENTS FOR ITEMS NOT ON THE AGENDA TODAY?
WE'LL GO AHEAD AND GO INTO THE MINUTES.
[7. MINUTES]
WE HAVE MINUTES TO TAKE A MOTION TO APPROVE FOR 7.1 MINUTES OF JANUARY 13TH AND 7.2 MINUTES OF JANUARY 27TH WHICH I BELIEVE COMMISSIONER VALDEZ WILL NOT TAKE PART IN.DOES ANYONE HAVE A MOTION TO APPROVE BOTH 7.1 MINUTES OF JANUARY 13TH AND 70.
>> I'LL MAKE A MOTION TO APPROVE THE MINUTES OF JANUARY 13, 2021 AND JANUARY 27, 2021.
[00:05:01]
>> COMMISSIONER RODRIGUEZ CEJA.
>> AND THEN NEXT WE HAVE 7.3 MINUTES OF MAY 26, 2021, WHICH I BELIEVE COMMISSIONER CEJA IS ABSTAINING.
>> I'LL MAKE A MOTION TO APPROVE THE MINUTES OF MAY 26, 2021.
>> COMMISSIONER RODRIGUEZ CEJA.
MOVING ON TO PUBLIC HEARING ITEMS, 8.1, ROBERSON PARCEL MAP, TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP
[8.1 Roberson Parcel Map– Tentative Parcel Map No. 38143 (TPM 21-02-410)]
NUMBER 38143.TODAY I BRING BEFORE YOU THE APPLICATION FOR A TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP, TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NUMBER 38143, AND THAT IS AN APPLICATION SUBMITTED BY GOLDIST ROBERSON.
THIS PROJECT IS LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF AVENUE 39, EAST OF ADAMS STREET AND WEST OF JEFFERSON STREET.
IT'S A 10-ACRE PARCEL THAT IS BEING REQUESTED TO BE SUBDIVIDE INTO 24 FOUR SINGLE-FAMILY DWELLINGS.
AS YOU CAN SEE, THERE IS A VACANT PROPERTY IN THE SURROUNDING AREAS, AND ALSO TO THE SOUTH.
THE ZONING FOR THIS PARCEL EQUESTRIAN ESTATES ARE EE ZONING AND ALL THE PARCELS TO THE NORTH ARE ZONED THE SAME WAY, AND THE PARCEL TO THE SOUTH IS ZONED RESIDENTIAL LOW.
AS YOU CAN SEE, THERE ARE SOME STRUCTURES ON THIS PROPERTY.
THERE IS A SINGLE-FAMILY DWELLING, AS WELL AS SOME OTHER ACCESSORY STRUCTURES.
HERE IS THE PARCEL MAP THAT IS, AS YOU CAN SEE, DIVIDE INTO THE FOUR LOTS, SINGLE FAMILY DWELLINGS THAT RANGE FROM 1.3 ACRES TO 3 ACRES.
PARCEL NUMBER 4 IS THE ONE THAT HAS A SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING.
THIS PROJECT HAS BEEN EVALUATED TO ENSURE THAT THE SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING MEETS THE DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS OF THE EE ZONING.
IT ALSO INCLUDES A PRIVATE STREET THAT IS DREAMS LANE, A COMMON BASE IS THAT'S FRONTING AVENUE THINE, AND A REMAINDER LOT.
THE REMAINDER LOT IS FOR 1.7-ACRE AREA THAT WAS PURCHASED BY CVWD FOR REGIONAL FLOOD CONTROL PURPOSES.
SOME OF THE STRUCTURES, AS YOU CAN SEE, INCLUDES A CHAIN LINK FENCING, A SHACK, AS WELL AS SOME CONCRETE PADS.
THOSE WILL EITHER HAVE TO BE REMOVED OR COME TO CONFORMANCE PRIOR TO THE RECORDATION OF THIS MAP, AND THAT WILL BE TAKEN CARE OF DURING THE CONTRACT PROCESS.
SO AS I MENTIONED BEFORE, THIS IS ZONING FOR QUESTIONS FROM AN ESTATES THAT ALLOWS A 2.0 DENIES PER ACRE OR IN OTHER WORDS HALF ACRE MINIMUM LOTS, HOWEVER, THE SUBDIVISION MAP ACT REQUIRES THAT I TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP APPROVAL HAS CONSISTENCY WITH THE GENERAL PLAN.
AND THE GENERAL PLAN IS DESERT ESTATES NEIGHBORHOOD UP TO 1.0 DENSITY UNITS PER ACRE OR 1 ACRE MINIMUM LOTS.
SO THIS PROJECT MEETS THE DENSITY FOR THE GENERAL PLAN, WHICH IS DESERT ESTATES NEIGHBORHOOD.
IT IS AT 0.48 DENSITY AND IT'S PER ACRE OR LOT REACHES FROM 1.38 ACRES TO 3 ACRES.
SO WITH THAT, STAFF RECOMMENDS APPROVAL OF THE RESOLUTION 1990, A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF INDIO, RECOMMENDING THAT THE CITY COUNCIL APPROVE THE TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NUMBER 38143 TO SUBDIVIDE A 10-ACRE PARCEL OF LAND INTO FOUR SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL PARCELS, A COMMON LOT, A PRIVATE STREET, A REMAINDER LOT ACQUIRED BY CVWD FOR THE DEVELOPMENT INFRASTRUCTURE ON THE NORTH FLOOD CONTROL CHANNEL LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF AVENUE 39 BETWEEN A STATEMENTS STREET AND JEFFERSON STREET, SUBJECT TO THE FINDINGS AND CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL THEREIN, AND IT'S BEEN DETERMINED THAT THE PROJECT IS EXEMPT FROM THE REQUIREMENTS OF CEQA SECTION 15315, AND THAT CONCLUDES MY STAFF REPORT.
[00:10:04]
THE APPLICANT IS AVAILABLE FOR ANY QUESTIONS.BEFORE WE ASK THE APPLICANT TO SPEAK, DOES ANYBODY HAVE ANY QUESTIONS FOR STAFF?
JUST TO TRIPLE CONFER FIRM, ROSIE, THIS DOES -- CONFIRM, THIS DOES MEET THE EQUESTRIAN ESTATE.
IT ALSO MEETS THE DENSITY AND THE GENERAL PLAN, RIGHT? ALL THREE ARE GOOD?
IT MEETS THE DENSITY BECAUSE THE DENSITY ALLOWS UP TO 1 AND THIS PROJECT IS 0.38 IN DENSITY, AND IT ALSO MEETS THE DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS, FOR EXAMPLE, SETBACKS, HEIGHT REQUIREMENTS OF THAT SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING THAT IS THERE, SO IT HAS BEEN EVALUATED FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE EQUESTRIAN STRUCTURE THAT IS THERE AS WELL AS MEETING THE SUBDIVISION MAP ACT WHICH ALLOWS UP TO ONE DENSITY UNIT PER ACRE.
>> I JUST WANTED TO CONFIRM BUT THERE'S THREE I DIDN'T THINGS THERE.
I JUST WANTED TO MAKE SURE I DIDN'T MISSED SOMETHING.
>> THE REASON FOR THAT IS RIGHT NOW BECAUSE WE HAVE ADOPTED THE GENERAL PLAN, THERE IS A DISCREPANCY WITH THE GENERAL PLAN AND THE ZONING, BUT THE SUBDIVISION MAP IS CLEAR ON WHAT NEEDS TO HAVE CONFORMANCE.
IF NOBODY HE'S ELSE HAS ANY QUESTIONS FOR STAFF WE CAN GO AHEAD AND LET THE APPLICANT SPEAK, PLEASE.
I'M THE CIVIL ENGINEER/SURVEYOR.
>> CHAIR, IF I MAY SUGGEST THAT YOU OPEN THE HEARING AND THEN ALLOW THE APPLICANT TO CONTINUE THEIR PRESENTATION.
CAN WE PLEASE OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING AND WE'LL HAVE THE APPLICANT SPEAK.
>> THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS OPENED AT 6:12 P.M.
I'M A CIVIL ENGINEER/LAND SURVEYOR SO I'M THE ONE THAT'S PREPARING THE PARCEL MAP.
I'M NOT THE GOLDIST ROBERSON BUT I'M MAKING THE MAP ON HIS BEHALF, SO I HAVE READ THROUGH THE CONDITIONS, SO I DON'T HAVE ANY OBJECTIONS AS OF YET, SO WE'RE GOING TO GO THROUGH THE CONTRACT PROCESS AND MAKE SURE EVERYTHING IS TO CODE, AND DEVELOP THOSE FOUR LOTS INDIVIDUALLY AS WE GO ALONG.
I APPRECIATE THE CITY OF INDIO TO GIVE US THIS OPPORTUNITY, AND I DIDN'T HAVE ANYTHING, ANY OTHER COMMENTS OTHER THAN THAT.
>> ANY OF THE COMMISSIONERS HAVE ANY QUESTIONS FOR THE APPLICANT?
I THINK IT'S PRETTY -- PRETTY SIMPLE, SO I'M COMFORTABLE.
WHAT IS THE TIMELINE FOR DEVELOPMENT OF THE ADDITIONAL THREE LOTS AND THE RESIDENCES BEING BUILT ON THOSE, MORE OR LESS?
>> ONCE THE PLANS ARE APPROVED, I'M GUESSING WITHIN THE NEXT YEAR OR TWO.
I DON'T HAVE A SPECIFIC -- SPECIFIC SCHEDULE.
THE CLIENT HASN'T REALLY DISCUSSED THAT WITH ME, BUT I'M ASSUMING IT'S IN THAT TIME FRAME.
COMMISSIONERS, IF ANYBODY WOULD LIKE TO MAKE A MOTION ON THIS.
>> CHAIR, IF I MIGHT SUGGEST THAT WE SEE IF THERE'S ANY PUBLIC COMMENT.
>> OR REQUESTS TO DO ORAL COMMENT.
>> THEN WE WILL CLOSE THE HEARING AND MOVE ON TO DELIBERATIONS.
>> DO WE HAVE ANY PUBLIC COMMENT?
>> THEN I'D LIKE TO CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING, AND BETWEEN THE COMMISSION, DOES NUB HAVE ANY COMMENTS OR WOULD ANYONE LIKE TO MAKE A MOTION?
>> CHAIR, I'D LIKE TO GO AHEAD AND MAKE A MOTION IF THERE ARE NO COMMENTS.
SO I'LL MAKE THE MOTION THAT WE APPROVE RESOLUTION NUMBER 1990, A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF INDIO, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING THAT THE CITY COUNCIL APPROVE THE TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NUMBER 38143 TO SUBDIVIDE A 10-ACRE PARCEL OF LAND INTO FOUR SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL PARCELS, A COMMON LOT, A
[00:15:04]
PRIVATE STREET, AND A REMAINDER LOT ACQUIRED BY CVWD FOR THE DEVELOPMENT INFRASTRUCTURE OF THE NORTH INDIO FLOOD CONTROL CHANNEL LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF AVENUE 39 BETWEEN ADAMS STREET AND JEFFERSON STREET, SUBJECT TO THE FINDINGS AND CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL THEREIN AND DETERMINED THAT THE PROJECT IS EXEMPT FROM THE REQUIREMENTS OF CEQA SECTION 15315.EVELYN, COULD WE PLEASE GET A ROLL CALL.
>> COMMISSIONER RODRIGUEZ CEJA.
NEXT ACTION ITEMS. WE HAVE NONE, AS WELL AS STUDY SESSION ITEMS, NO STUDY SESSION ITEMS FOR THIS MEETING.
[11. STAFF ITEMS]
MOVING AHEAD TO STAFF ITEMS, LEILA, KEVIN, DO WE HAVE ANY STAFF ITEMS TO REVIEW?GOOD EVENING, PLANNING COMMISSION MEMBERS AND MEMBERS OF THE PUBLIC.
JUST A VERY QUICK REMINDER THERE WILL A JOINT SESSION WITH CITY COUNCIL ON THEY HOUSING ELEMENT UPDATE PROJECT.
THAT WILL BE JUNE 16TH FROM 3:00 P.M.
YOU CAN PARTICIPATE IN OUR AND ARE ASKED TO PARTICIPATE VIRTUALLY.
THAT CONTACT INFORMATION WOULD BE HAVE HAD PROVIDE YOU TO YOU BY THE CITY CLERK'S OFFICE BY THE END OF THE WEEK, AND THE PURPOSE OF THIS SECOND JOINT MEETING WILL BE TO GET A STATUS REPORT FROM THE CONSULTANT TEAM AND STAFF ON THE PROGRESS OF OUR WORK EFFORTS TO DISCUSS THE FINDINGS FROM THE SITE'S INVENTORY ANALYSIS WHICH IS A REQUIRED ELEMENT AND ALSO TO ENGAGE IN A DISCUSSION ABOUT POTENTIAL FUTURE IMPLEMENTATION ACTIONS TO HOPEFULLY PROACTIVELY SUPPORT THE PRODUCTION OF MORE HOUSING IN OUR COMMUNITY.
TO 4:00 P.M., AND WE HOPE THAT YOU WILL ALL ABLE TO MAKE IT, AND, LEILA, I'LL TURN IT OVER TO YOU.
I JUST WANTED TO PROVIDE THE INFORMATION THAT ON THE 16TH, ALSO, THE PROJECT CHURCH AT THE RED DOOR WILL GO BEFORE THE CITY COUNCIL FOR REVIEW AND APPROVAL.
IF IT GETS APPROVED, IT WILL COME BACK BEFORE YOU FOR THE CUP AND DESIGN REVIEW CONSIDERATION.
LEILA, I CAN GET THAT DATE AGAIN FOR THE RED DOOR TO GO IN FRONT OF CITY COUNCIL.
[12. COMMISSIONER COMMENTS]
DO MY FELLOW COMMISSIONERS HAVE ANY COMMENTS?
ARE WE GETTING MI REPORT ON THE FINDINGS OF THE SURVEY THAT WAS DONE FOR COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT AROUND HOUSING NEEDS?
>> ARE YOU TALKING ABOUT OUR COMMUNITY SURVEY FOR THE HOUSING UPDATE PROJECT?
>> WE DID -- WE WILL TOUCH ON IT AT THE MEETING WITH COUNCIL BUT I CAN REPORT WE HAD A TOTAL OF 176 RESPONSES, AND THIS WAS AN ENGLISH/SPANISH SURVEY AND WE WILL BE SUMMARIZING THE KEY THEMES, IF YOU WILL, FROM THAT SURVEY DURING THAT MEETING.
DO WE KNOW IF WE'RE GOING TO BE GOING BACK IN PERSON IN JULY OR JUST NEED KNOW IF I NEED TO BE IN TOWN OR NOT.
>> SO ACTUALLY OUR CITY COUNCIL, OUR CITY MANAGER AND SUPPORTED BY OUR CITY ATTORNEY WILL BE ASKING A DISCUSSION WITH THE CITY COUNCIL ABOUT WHAT ARE THE POTENTIAL NEXT STEPS.
THERE IS A LOT OF -- HOW DO I SAY THIS? -- A LOT OF CONFLICTING MESSAGES WE'RE GETTING OUT OF THE STATE RIGHT NOW THAT WE'RE HOPING WE'LL HAVE SOME MORE RESOLUTION BY THE COUNCIL MEETING, SO AT THAT TIME COMING OUT OF THAT COUNCIL DISCUSSION, HOPEFULLY WE WILL BE ABLE TO SHARE WITH THE COMMISSION, ALL THE COMMISSIONS ACTUALLY, KIND OF WHAT OUR PRACTICE GOING FORWARD WILL BE.
I DO ANTICIPATE THE EXACT -- YOU ZACH MAY NEED TO HELP ME HERE, BUT THE GOVERNOR IS NOT GOING TO RESCIND THE ORDER SURROUNDING THE BROWN ACT AND THE CONDUCT OF VIRTUAL MEETINGS AT LEAST FOR FORESEEABLE FUTURE SO THERE IS STILL AN OPPORTUNITY TO HAVE A HYBRID VERSION OF IN-PERSON AND VIRTUAL.
AM I SAYING THAT CORRECTLY, ZACH?
>> YEAH, I BELIEVE THAT'S ACCURATE.
MY UNDERSTANDING IS THEY ADVISE THAT THE PROVISIONS IN EXECUTIVE ORDER N-29-20,
[00:20:05]
WHICH I READ THAT PREAMBLE AT THE BEGINNING TO KIND OF EXPLAIN IT, BY THE AUTHORITY BY WHICH WE CAN DO THESE VIRTUAL MEETINGS, IS THAT THE GOVERNOR HAS EXPRESSED LOCAL AGENCIES ARE GOING TO HAVE THE TIME NECESSARY TO MEET STATUTORY AND LOGISTICAL REQUIREMENTS TO KIND OF WIND THAT PROCESS DOWN, SO THERE ISN'T -- THERE ISN'T A CLEAR END DATE FOR WHEN THE ENHANCED TELECONFERENCING CIVILITY WILL END.IT SEEMS LIKE IT'S BEEN GOING ON FOREVER AND EVER.
>> HOPEFULLY COMING OUT OF THAT, HOPEFULLY WE'LL HAVE CLARITY AS TO WHEN THOSE MIGHT RESUME, WHAT IF ANY RESTRICTIONS WILL BE PUT IN PLACE.
YOU KNOW, IT'S AGAIN WITH THE STATE KIND OF GOING TO AN ALL-CLEAR ON JUNE 15TH, WE'RE STILL TRYING TO ASCERTAIN WHAT THE EXPECTATIONS OF LOCAL GOVERNMENT WILL BE.
WE DO UNDERSTAND, AT LEAST I UNDERSTAND THAT THERE MAY BE SOME FLEXIBILITY FOR LOCAL GOVERNMENTS TO DECIDE WHETHER OR NOT THEY WANT TO IMPOSE SOME MEASUREMENTS OR NOT, SO I GUESS STAY TUNED.
HOPEFULLY WE'LL HAVE SOME INFORMATION FOR YOU.
BUT I DO BELIEVE, COMMISSIONER FRANZ, THAT EVEN IF WE DO GO BACK TO IN-PERSON, THERE WOULD STILL BE THE HYBRID SO YOU'D BE ABLE TO PARTICIPATE VIRTUALLY IF YOU SO CHOOSE.
IF THERE'S NO FURTHER COMMENTS, IF ANYONE WOULD LIKE TO MAKE A MOTION FOR ADJOURNMENT.
>> I'LL MAKE A MOTION TO ADJOURN.
>> COMMISSIONER RODRIGUEZ CEJA.
>> HOPE TO SEE YOU ALL NEXT WEEK.
* This transcript was compiled from uncorrected Closed Captioning.